|
Last year President Bush
signed into law an enormous tax relief program called The Economic
Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA). The
effective date for many provisions was January 1, 2002. On March 9,
2002, the President signed into law the Job Creation and Worker
Assistance Act of 2002. That act has provisions that are
retroactive to September 2001. The new legislation invokes significant
income tax changes, but its broad sweep also has enormous implications
for IRAs, retirement plans, minimum distributions and estate taxes. For
more details on the changes, we recommend that you read our articles: “The
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 Summary”
and “Finalized
Regulations for Retirement Plan Distributions.”
This newsletter concentrates
on how to take advantage of the major income tax provisions that we
think will have an impact on our readers' taxes. Please get paper and
pen ready to make a list of your personal “action points.”
Tax Loss Harvesting
Most investors lost money in
the stock market. Tax planning can't restore your losses, but it can
soften the blow. Using losses to reduce taxable gains by means of
tax-savvy realization of losses to match gains is referred to as loss
harvesting or tax-loss selling. For many readers, tax
loss harvesting is the single most important area for reducing taxes
now and in the future. Financial planners and advisors who understand
and apply these principles really do offer “value added service.” Proper
tax loss harvesting strategies can save you taxes and help you diversify
your portfolio in ways you may not have considered. Now is the time
to start thinking about harvesting losses to offset unrealized capital
gains.
Example:
Assume you have a winner;
you bought it for $50, it is now worth $100 and there is no adjustment
to the basis.
Also, please assume, you
have a loser; you bought it for $100 and now it is worth $50. What are
your options?
Idea 1: Buy and Hold
Do nothing, buy and hold.
No taxes on any transaction. Next year, if you sell the winner, perhaps
in a rebalancing or diversification attempt, and hold on to the loser,
you will have to pay $10 in capital gains tax ($50 x 20% tax = $10 tax).
Idea 2: Dump the Loser
Assume your capital gains
rate is 20%. Sell the loser and deduct $50 in losses. This means you
will pay $10 less in taxes than you would have if you had done nothing
(Idea 1). Knowing that you will pay $10 less in taxes (the 20% of your
losses that you can deduct), you can afford to reinvest $60 (the $50
sale price of the investment, plus the $10 tax savings; subject to
limitations), which is 20% more than your losing investment was worth
($60 is 20% more than $50). So, you get an immediate $10 benefit. When
you add state capital gains taxes, the savings are greater.
If you later sell the winner
for $100 and have to pay capital gains tax of $10 ($50 X 20%) at least
you enjoyed the time value of your $10 while you held the stock. If you
can use other losses to offset the winner, you would be $10 ahead plus
the growth on the $10 over time.
Idea 3: Dump the Loser and
Repurchase
Let's assume you like the
loser or it is a “core holding” of your portfolio or you think the loser
will come back. Sell the loser and then, subject to the wash rules, buy
it, or something similar to it, back. Assume you made the correct
decision to sell and repurchase. After repurchasing the loser for $50,
it goes back to $100. Except for transactions fees, you would have the
benefit of the $10 savings you made by deducting the loss, and you have
the growth. Furthermore, you have maintained the integrity of your
portfolio.
Idea 4: Use Your Losses to
Diversify Your Portfolio
Let's assume you have a
heavy position in a particular stock or mutual fund in a particular
sector (like a large cap fund) that has a low basis. You have avoided
selling it for years because you are too cheap to pay the capital gains
tax. (Let's be honest here.) Then, either your advisor nags you or the
fear of an Enron scenario makes you want to diversify.
Let's assume that the basis
is $10,000, and the value is $100,000. You never sold it because you
didn't want to pay the $18,000 in taxes ($100,000 proceeds less $10,000
basis = $90,000 gain X 20% = $18,000).
Let's also assume you have a
loser or losers with a combined loss of $90,000. You sell both, winner
and loser, offset the gains and the losses and pay no capital gains. Lo
and behold, you just opened up your window to diversification and
getting out of that heavy concentration in one stock or sector problem.
You repurchase the winner and the loser or whatever you like, and your
basis will be your purchase price.
The best losses are
short-term capital losses. This is because the IRS forces you to match
short-term gains against short-term losses and long-term gains against
long-term losses first. Then the net short-term results are netted
against the net long-term results. If the result is a gain, it will be
taxable as short-term, long-term, or a combination thereof. If the
losses incurred were short-term rather than long-term, there will be a
better chance that your gain will be long-term instead of short-term and
taxed at lower rates. The short-term gains tax rate can be almost
twice the long-term gains tax rate. Therefore, if you own losing
investments that you have owned for less than a year, they are a better
choice for tax-loss selling than long-term investments.
The following example is
somewhat complicated but it demonstrates why it is critical to think
ahead and map out a strategy to capitalize on gains and losses.
Imagine you hold an
investment that qualifies for a short-term capital loss (i.e., a losing
investment held for less than a year) with an unrecognized loss of
$20,000. You also have a long-term winner with an unrecognized gain of
$20,000. You decide not to sell either prior to year-end. After all
you haven't really lost any money on paper. (Hint: this may be bad
logic.)
The following year you
decide it's time to sell the long-term winner and recognize a $20,000
long-term gain at a long-term tax rate of 20%. In this same year, you
also incur a short-term capital gain of $10,000 from the sale of another
stock. You now have $30,000 in taxable income to recognize.
In the meantime, the loser
is still down $20,000. Fine you think, let's sell the $20,000 loser,
offset it against the $20,000 gain, and pay tax on the $10,000 gain. (By
the time you decide to sell the loser, it is no longer a short-term
transaction because you have held it for over a year.) When you prepare
your 2002 Schedule D, you report a long-term gain and long-term loss
that net to $0. You also report a short-term gain of $10,000 taxed at
your ordinary rate of 30% that costs you $3,000 of federal income taxes.
What you could have
done was sell the loser while you could still realize the short-term
capital loss, and deduct a $3,000 loss at your ordinary tax rate of 30%,
or $900 ($3000 X 30% = $900) and recognize a $17,000 short-term loss
carryover. In the following year, using the netting rules, the $10,000
short-term gain would be offset by the $17,000 short-term loss
carryover. The excess short-term loss of $7,000 would then offset the
long-term gain of $20,000 leaving you with a long-term taxable gain of
$13,000. This gain would result in tax of $2,600 ($13,000 X 20%). The
net tax over these two years is only $1,700.
In summary, recognizing the
short-term loss when you had the chance would have saved you $1,300 or
43% of the total taxes.
If your net capital losses
exceed your net capital gains, you can deduct up to $3,000 of the losses
(short or long-term) against ordinary income. That adds up to a $900 tax
savings for an individual who is in a 30% tax bracket. Be careful to
avoid a wash sale, i.e., buying the same security back within 30
days before or after you sell the shares. Tax rules will disallow the
loss. Keep in mind, however, that with all the stock and mutual fund
choices, there is probably a similar investment available for you to
park your money in for 30 days. This may be a better strategy than
keeping funds in cash for 30 days waiting to repurchase the same stock
since the market or the sector may move up significantly in 30 days.
Selling investments to
realize net losses in excess of $3,000 is a good idea too. The losses
will carry over to future years when future gains can be reduced. Plus,
up to another $3,000 per year can be deducted from ordinary income.
Even if investments you currently hold recover in value, you would have
been much better off by selling them at a loss and reinvesting the
proceeds in similar investments. Using this strategy, you will hold
investments of the same value, but with a lower cost basis and have
additional tax savings each year. To the extent that the $3,000 net
loss is deducted against ordinary income every year, you save money at
ordinary tax rates. The loss carryover can also eliminate future
short-term and long-term capital gains and will free you from
subsequently sticking with investments only because of the holding
period. If the remaining investments are subsequently sold at a gain,
it will be taxed at lower long-term gain rates, and the overall result
will be less tax than holding the original investment. If the
investment with a lower basis remains to become part of your final
estate, the heirs will get a step-up in basis and avoid the tax
altogether.
Harvesting your investment
losses can reduce your capital gain income to zero and give you a bonus
of a $3,000 ordinary income reduction each year. It's a great way to
increase the after-tax rate of return on your portfolio without the
risks of active trading. In combination with a good asset allocation
and reallocation strategy, you can add value to your investment
portfolio without increasing your investment risk.
If you find all of this too
overwhelming, and yet you see the inherent value of the advice, perhaps
you would be well advised to consult with your financial advisor and
your tax advisor.
ALERT-Special Allowance
Depreciation
If you filed your 2001 tax
return prior to June 1, 2002, and did not claim the new special
depreciation allowance for new cars and qualifying property (for
example—new items such as equipment, computers, furniture, etc.)
resulting from the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002,
you should consider filing an amended return to get a 2001 refund. The
amended 1040X return must be filed by April 15, 2003. See IRS
publication 3991 for specific details of qualifying depreciable property
and details on how to compute the additional depreciation.
Alternative Minimum Tax
With the four top income tax
rates falling by another half-point in 2002, the popular recommended
strategy of accelerating deductions this year and deferring income into
next year can be advantageous. In recent years, many individuals have
used this strategy to defer taxes and take advantage of the time value
of money concept. Add to the equation real tax savings because of lower
tax rates, and this strategy makes even better sense. Before you jump
headfirst into this strategy, please be aware that Alternative Minimum
Tax (AMT) rules can totally offset the benefits. Top factors leading to
AMT liability are an increased number of personal exemptions, limited
medical expenses, disallowed items such as miscellaneous itemized
deductions and certain home equity interest. Unfortunately, if you have
an excessive amount of these deductions, you are a very good candidate
for the AMT. Because the IRS has failed to index the AMT exemption in
2002, more taxpayers will be subject to the AMT. In general, you
compute your tax liability using both regular tax rates and the AMT tax
rates and pay the higher of the two. If you determine that you may fall
prey to AMT in 2002, holding off paying certain deductible expenses such
as state and local taxes, real estate taxes, etc. until next year may
prove to be advantageous.
There was some positive
movement in this area due to changes introduced in the Job Creation
and Worker Assistance Act of 2002. Education credits, dependent
care credit and other credits that were allowed to reduce both regular
tax and AMT were due to expire at the end of 2001. This provision has
been extended and will be in effect for 2002 and 2003.
Qualifying Taxpayers
Should Plan to Convert a Portion of their Traditional IRA to a Roth IRA
The benefits of converting a
traditional IRA to a Roth IRA are discussed at length in our
peer-reviewed article, Roth IRAs: Accumulating Tax
Free Wealth. The conversion must be completed before year-end
and many brokerage houses recommend getting the Roth IRA conversion form
to their offices well before year-end to qualify for a year 2002
conversion.
Current law dictates that
tax rates will be lower in the upcoming years. But waiting to convert to
a Roth IRA until rates are lower is risky. Yes, the converted amounts
would be taxed at a lower rate but considering the current market
conditions, your IRA account value may be at its lowest point. A 3%
recovery in your account value between now and 2005 would offset the 2%
tax rate reduction savings that is in effect for tax years 2004-2005.
Consider Recharacterizing
your Roth IRA
A complete discussion of
Roth IRA converting and unconverting is found in a separate article on
our web site, Finessing Market
Uncertainties: Roth IRA
Conversion Strategies.
Transfer Appreciated
Stock to Children 14 Years Old or Older
Consider transferring stock
to your child. For example, assume you are in a 27% tax bracket and are
planning to sell some appreciated long-term held stock (at least five
years) to pay for your child's education. Your child is in a 10% tax
bracket. Consider making a gift and transferring the stock to your child
who subsequently sells the stock. You have effectively shifted long-term
capital gains from a 20% taxation rate to your child's long-term capital
gains tax rate of eight percent.
Financing an Education
for Your Children and Grandchildren
Let's start with my favorite
way to finance the education of your family.
Section 529 Qualified State Tuition Plans
The 529 Plans, which are distinct from the
prepaid tuition plans, provide an excellent way to save for college. The
529 Plans now allow tax-free withdrawals for all “qualifying
educational expenses.”
529 plans also have significant estate tax
advantages. Ideally, they can be considered a gift to children or
grandchildren who will eventually go to college. However, if you decide
for whatever reason you want to take the money back and use it for
yourself, you may do so¾a
little like a gift with a string attached that you can yank back if and
whenever you want.
If you currently have UTMA/UGMA accounts for
your children or grandchildren holding their “college funds,” now may be
the ideal time to liquidate those accounts and establish a 529 Plan
account. There is a very good chance that minimal or no income taxes
would be incurred due to depressed market prices. Any future market
appreciation would escape from income taxes if used for “qualifying
educational expenses.” Due to increased competition between state
programs, setup and maintenance costs are lower than ever.
A disadvantage of the 529 Plan is that your
investment options are limited. Also, 529 Plans may be inappropriate if
you can afford to pay tuition directly and make a personal gift.
For example:
You have a potential federal estate tax and
are trying to reduce your estate with gifts to children or
grandchildren. Your grandchild is 18 and you want to take care of his
tuition and give him an additional $11,000. If you put $11,000 in a 529
Plan account, that is deemed a gift to him; however, if you pay his
tuition directly, that is not deemed a gift and you can give him an
additional $11,000 without eating into your once-in-a-lifetime
exclusion. Under these circumstances, you would be better off not
establishing a 529 Plan account.
Some financial planners feel that because of
the shift from the need-based scholarships to the merit-based
scholarships, parents are well advised to concentrate their effort on
qualifying for aid rather than saving for college in a tax efficient
manor. I disagree because I assume most of my clients' children and
grandchildren will not qualify for aid and prefer the certainty of the
tax savings.
A more detailed discussion of 529 Plans is
found in the article
"Saving
for College with a Qualified State Tuition Program (QSTP)."
Tax Planning for
Education Tax Credits
You can help yourself to a
lower tax bill if you follow some of the steps below. Be sure to
maximize any available education credits that you qualify for. Knowing
when and when not to prepay tuition expenses could save otherwise
reduced or lost college tax credits. You might want to contact your tax
advisor for assistance in this area.
New in 2002:
Deduction for Qualified Higher Education Expenses. Beginning in
2002, these expenses are now eligible for an above-the-line deduction.
Taxpayers may claim this deduction whether or not they itemize their
deductions. Taxpayers with an adjusted gross income not exceeding
$65,000 ($130,000 in the case of married couples filing joint returns)
are entitled to a maximum deduction of $3,000 per year. These gross
income limits are higher than the levels necessary for qualifying for
the Hope and Lifetime Learning education credits.
Maximize Student Loan
Interest. More college grads will be eligible to deduct student
loan interest in 2002. Deductions will no longer be limited to the
first 60 months that payments are required on the loan. More
importantly, the income eligibility limits will rise to $65,000 for
singles and $130,000 for couples.
Let your Child Claim the
Hope or Lifetime Learning Credits. If you're tired of losing
education tax credits because of your income bracket, all is not lost.
If you are eligible to claim your student child as a dependent, but
choose not to, your child may be able to claim a Hope Scholarship or
Lifetime Learning Credit for the qualified tuition and related expenses
that you paid. This move can be a family tax saver if your income level
is above the phase out range for claiming the tax credit. Of course your
child must have a taxable income to claim the credit. Note that the
child cannot claim the forfeited dependency exemption on his own return.
This is really good when your child's dependency exemption is partially
or fully phased out on the parent's return.
For example:
The parent(s) give
appreciated stock to the child as a gift. The child, in turn sells the
stock to pay for qualifying tuition expenses. The capital gain is
reported and taxable on the child's return at a much lower tax rate. The
tax savings could be as much as 12% on the long-term gain. The tax
liability is now offset by the education tax credit claimed on your
child's return. If you are applying for financial aid, keep in mind that
the student's assets are a much bigger factor in the financial aid
formula than the parents' assets. However, if you are incorporating this
strategy, you probably don't qualify for financial aid assistance.
Contribute to a Coverdell
Education Savings Account (formerly called Education IRAs).
There are two significant changes in education savings accounts
beginning in 2002. First, the contribution limit has increased from $500
to $2000 per designated beneficiary per year. Second, these tax-free
accounts can be used to pay for elementary and high school expenses. Now
parents and grandparents have a tax-free savings vehicle to meet
education costs from kindergarten to graduate school. Beginning in
2002, taxpayers are allowed to make contributions until April 15 of the
following year. In addition, contributions may be made to both an
Education Savings Account and a 529 Plan for the same designated
beneficiary.
There are income limitations
on the Coverdell Education Savings Account. One way to avoid the income
limitations is to give your children or grandchildren money and have
them purchase their own Education Savings Account.
New in 2002
Eligible educators-
kindergarten through grade 12 teachers, instructors, counselors, etc.,
can deduct up to $250 in qualified expenses (basically classroom
supplies and computer expenses) as an adjustment to gross income. As
usual, there are a few requirements that must be met in order to
qualify.
Oldies, But Goodies
Make or Increase
Retirement Plan Contributions: Business owners can
reduce AGI by increasing contributions to pre-existing retirement plans
or establishing a new plan such as 401(k) plans, SIMPLE pension plans,
SEPs, Keogh plans, or regular (deductible) IRAs. Most self-employed
retirement plans allow for deductions in tax year 2002, although payment
can be postponed until the extended due date for filing the return. In
other words, payment of 2002 deductible retirement plan contributions
can be postponed until October 15, 2003 in certain cases.
Maximize Loss
Situations: If you are experiencing an unusual tax year where
you may be in a much lower tax bracket than usual or even in jeopardy of
wasting itemized deductions and personal exemptions, careful tax
planning can be more crucial than ever. Make sure you project your
taxable income before the year-end has passed and examine all your
alternatives.
Enroll in a Cafeteria
or Flexible Spending Plan: If you have not yet done so, please
enroll in your employer's Cafeteria or Flexible Spending Plan for the
year 2003. This strategy allows you to pay for medical, child-care and
other qualified expenses with pre-tax dollars. Medical expenses are
rarely fully deductible on Schedule A due to the 7.5% of AGI limitation.
Medical costs paid for through your company's cafeteria plan, however,
will allow you to fully deduct your medical expenses from your W-2 wages
that include social security taxes.
Make a good estimate of your
projected qualified expenses for the year. If you set aside more pre-tax
dollars than you will be able to claim, the unused portion is forfeited.
Don't let the forfeiture risk deter you from participating, just be a
little more conservative in your estimate. If you are currently enrolled
in a program, review your outstanding balance, and if necessary,
schedule a dentist, doctor, optometrist, chiropractor, etc. appointment
before December 31st.
Calculate Medical
Expenses: If this year's out-of-pocket medical expenses are
larger than usual and your company doesn't offer a flexible spending
account, it makes sense to compute if you're eligible to write-off your
medical expenses. The total medical expenses must exceed 7.5% of your
adjusted gross income to qualify. Because very few people normally beat
the 7.5% test, be sure to pay as much as you can before the year-end in
a year that you qualify for medical itemized deduction.
Take Advantage of
Pre-Tax Parking Breaks: If your employer offers pre-tax dollars
to be used for parking, mass transit or van pools, take advantage of the
tax savings. Many individuals are not afforded the luxury of being able
to deduct personal parking costs.
Make a Roth IRA
Contribution: If you qualify, making an annual $3,000 Roth IRA
contribution (up to $3,500 if over the age of 50 by the end of 2002)
both for you and your spouse will help you accumulate tax-free wealth.
You have until April 15, 2003 to fund a 2002 Roth IRA even though
the deadline for converting a traditional IRA to a Roth is December 31,
2002.
Recognizing Losses on IRA
Investments: If you have a loss on
your traditional or Roth IRAs, you can recognize a loss on your income
tax return, but only when all the amounts in all your IRA accounts of
that type (Roth or Traditional) have been distributed and the total
distributions are less than your unrecovered basis, if any. You claim
the loss as a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to 2% of adjusted
gross income limits on Schedule A. See IRS Publication
590 for details if you think
you may qualify. This is useful if your IRA was basically wiped out and
you are holding worthless paper. In that case, at least enjoy the tax
savings. If your IRA suffered but there is still some value, then
retaining the IRA will likely be more valuable than the limited tax
benefit of claiming the loss.
Make your Non-Cash
Charitable Deductions before December 31:
The IRS allows a deduction
for the lower of cost or fair market value for your non-cash
contributions. Please remember to ask for a receipt. You must provide a
schedule if your non-cash contributions exceed $500.
Donate Stock Instead
of Cash to your Favorite Charity: If you hold an appreciated
publicly traded stock for more than one-year, you can donate the stock
and get a charitable deduction for the full market value of the stock
and avoid paying any capital gains tax. You must give the stock
directly to the charity. The opposite is true for stocks that have gone
down in value. Never donate stocks that have declined in value, but
rather sell the stock at a loss and donate the cash to charity.
Avoid Doubling Up on
First Year Minimum Distributions: It's possible to receive two
minimum distributions in the year after you reach age 70 1/2. This may
push you into a higher tax bracket, or even worse, cause some of your
social security benefits to become taxable. Analyze your situation to
see what strategy benefits you the most. Please see details in our
Minimum Distribution Calculator, by
entering 1930 or 1931 in the year of birth column.
Self-Employed
Individuals Should Consider Employing their Child(ren):
Employing your child (age permitting) offers great tax-saving
opportunities. Assuming your child has no unearned income, the parent
could pay the child wages up to $4,700 in 2002, and the child would not
have to pay any federal income taxes. The next $6,000 would be subject
to a 10% tax rate. If the parents' marginal income tax bracket were
27%, the $10,700 wage deduction would generate $2,289 in federal income
tax savings. Furthermore, when you employ a child under 18-years-old,
neither the employer nor the employee is subject to social security tax
on the child's wages. The wages your child earns will qualify as earned
income for the purpose of establishing a Roth IRA. A Roth IRA will
provide your child with an exceptional opportunity to accumulate money
with tax-free growth.
Self-Employed
Individuals with No Employees Should Consider Employing Their Spouse:
A self-employed individual may be able to deduct all of their health
insurance premiums and medical expenses by setting up a medical
reimbursement plan with his/her spouse as the only employee of his/her
business. Your spouse must become a bona fide employee of your business.
Theoretically, that means your spouse will be working under your
control. Good luck.
Last, But Not Least
High-income taxpayers should consider
investing in tax-exempt investments.
Middle- or low-income taxpayers should
consider selling tax-exempt investments and aim for greater appreciation
or income.
Be sure that you meet the
requirements for excluding gain on the sale of your principal residence.
The exclusion amounts are up to $250,000 for single filers and
$500,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly.
Conclusion
We hope this year-end
planning letter has been helpful. These strategies are aimed at reducing
both your short-term and long-term tax burden. Please take a moment to
review your personal game plan to be sure you are not missing any
opportunities.
If you are in need of tax
planning and/or income tax preparation, the CPA side of our business
stands prepared to help you. Client satisfaction was at an all time high
last tax season. This year, we happily report that all five
tax-preparers are returning, and we expect an even better year.
We wish you and your family
a happy, healthy and profitable holiday season and New Year!
|
James
Lange
is
a tax attorney and CPA with a thriving retirement
and estate planning practice in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania. He
focuses on the unique needs of individuals
with appreciable assets in their IRAs and
401(k) plans. His
plans include tax-savvy advice, will and
trust preparation, and intricate beneficiary
designations for IRAs and other retirement
plans. Jim's
advice and recommendations have received
national attention from syndicated columnist
Jane Bryant Quinn, and his articles are
frequently published in Financial
Planning, Kiplinger's Retirement
Report and
The Tax Adviser.
|
|